Search for: "PRA III LLC"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322-23.III. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322-23.III. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:09 am
Hirakis RICHMOND COUNTYCreditors' and Debtors' RightsPlaintiff Fails to Show It Is a Licensed Debt Collector Or Plead Licensing Information Under CPLR §3015(e) PRA III LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm
As you may recall, the PTO had to stand down on its Appeal regulation on the morning it was to go into effect because the Office of Management and Budget withheld the PTO’s power to enforce those regulations, after a number of letters pointed out PTO violations of the PRA. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
" 188 LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Caltrans refused and petitioners filed suit on November 1, 2017, alleging (i) Caltrans improperly relied on section 103, (ii) the department is estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations period, and (iii) additional claims on the merits of the adequacy of the FEIR for the project. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Caltrans refused and petitioners filed suit on November 1, 2017, alleging (i) Caltrans improperly relied on section 103, (ii) the department is estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations period, and (iii) additional claims on the merits of the adequacy of the FEIR for the project. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Caltrans refused and petitioners filed suit on November 1, 2017, alleging (i) that Caltrans improperly relied on section 103, (ii) that the department is estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations period, and (iii) additional claims on the merits of the adequacy of the FEIR for the project. [read post]
